The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slave to Abbasid (ca 750)

Wednesday, September 20, 2017

The English cherry picking neo-con fruit cake lady Mrs. May aspiring for a neo-"British empire"-colonialism


Mrs Theresa May's secret agenda to protect her islamofascist Saudi friends/"allies" by muffling "islamophobia"/"Saudiphobia" and by calling criticism and the defense of the most basic Human Rights "extremism"?


Theresa May denies suppressing report into Saudi Arabia’s funding of UK islamist extremism to protect arms deals.


Mrs Theresa May: “There is certain confidential information in the report which means it would not be appropriate to publish it.”

Klevius: If this extremist report had been about Iran, Russia or China, it would have been published in full and available on every possible social media - without Mrs. May asking to suppress it.

And whom are we talking about? The last remaining true dictator "monarchy", the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who use a Medieval religious hate ideology for its own benefits and the murdering, raping and terrorizing of others - not to mention its poisonous effects all over the world in different institutions and among politicians.

BBC and her neo-cons seem to be much more concerned about peaceful China than the islamic hate mongering islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

But China lacks completely such a hate ideology (Maoism* is dead) and therefore has to rest on peaceful manufacturing and investment of surplus from this manufacturing, which by now constitutes the by far most important worldwide empoverment of previously underdeveloped communities. I.e. something quite different from May's and Trump's aggressive weapons waiving/selling, combined with aiding Saudi islamofascist aggressions in Yemen, Syria, Bahrain, Iraq, Myanmar etc. etc.

* Islamism has caused way more victims throughout 1,400 years than short lived Maoism ever managed to do.

Here's a muslim view on Theresa May:


However, do notice the extremely (sorry about that) different ideological basis when comparing Klevius to muslims. Whereas the muslim ideology is rooted in disgusting "conquests" (i.e. attacks on innocent people called "kaffirs"), looting, raping, murdering and enslaving (read history, e.g. Hugh Kennedy), Klevius ideology is rooted in U.N.'s anti-fascist Human Rights declaration of 1948.



Klevius wrote:

Wednesday, March 22, 2017

UK PM escaping when "the best ally", the islamofascist Saudi dictator family attacks the Parliament.

Why is she continuing dealing with and supporting the worst spreaders of hate and evil?

Islam's "custodians", the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (together with Saudi based and steered OIC) constitutes the heart of evil islam in today's world. So why an "ally"?



The islamofascist Saudi dictator family is said to be the world's largest source of funds and promoter of Salafist muslim jihadism, which forms the ideological basis of terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda, Taliban, ISIS and others. Moreover, donors in Saudi Arabia constitute the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide.

The violence in Afghanistan and Pakistan is partly bankrolled by wealthy donors from the Arabian peninsula whose "governments" support them. Three other muslim Arab countries which are listed as sources of militant money are Qatar, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates, all neighbors of Saudi Arabia. Taliban and their militant partners the Haqqani network earn "significant funds" through UAE-based businesses. Kuwait is described as a "source of funds and a key transit point" for al-Qaida and other militant groups. The Pakistani militant muslim outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba, which carried out the 2008 Mumbai attacks, used a Saudi-based front company to fund its activities in 2005. According to studies, most of suicide bombers in Iraq are Saudis. 15 of the 19 muslim hijackers of the four airliners who were responsible for 9/11 originated from Saudi Arabia, two from the United Arab Emirates, one from Egypt, and one from Lebanon. Osama bin Laden was raised in Saudi Arabia - just like BBC's sharia presenter Mishal Husain btw.

Starting in the mid-1970s the islamic resurgence was funded by an abundance of money from Saudi Arabian oil exports. The tens of billions of dollars in "petro-islam" largess obtained from the recently heightened price of oil funded an estimated "90% of the expenses of the entire faith."

Throughout the Sunni Muslim world, religious institutions for people both young and old, from children's maddrassas to high-level scholarships received Saudi funding, "books, scholarships, fellowships, and mosques" (for example, "more than 1500 mosques were built and paid for with money obtained from public Saudi funds over the last 50 years"), along with training in the Kingdom for the preachers and teachers who went on to teach and work at these universities, schools, mosques, etc.[108] The funding was also used to reward journalists and academics who protected the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and its spread of hate; and satellite campuses were built around Egypt for Al Azhar, the world's oldest and most influential islamic university.

Saudi-based Wahhabism or Salafism preaches that (Sunni) muslims should not only "always oppose" infidels "in every way," but "hate them for their religion ... for Allah's sake," that democracy "is responsible for all the horrible wars of the 20th century," that Shia and other "wrong-muslims" were "infidels", etc. According to former Prime Minister of Singapore Lee Kuan Yew, while this effort has by no means converted all, or even most, muslims to the Saudi Wahhabist islam, it has done much to overwhelm more moderate local interpretations of islam in Southeast Asia, and to pitch the Saudi-interpretation of islam as the "gold standard" of religion in minds of muslims across the globe.

Patrick Cockburn accused the islamofascist Saudi dictator family of supporting extremist islamist groups in the Syrian Civil War, writing: "In Syria, in early 2015, it (i.e. the islamofascist Saudi dictator family) supported the creation of the Army of Conquest, primarily made up of the al-Qaeda affiliate the al-Nusra Front and the ideologically similar Ahrar al-Sham, which won a series of victories against the Syrian Army in Idlib province."

While the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's "government" denies claims that it exports religious or cultural extremism, it is argued that by its nature, Wahhabism encourages intolerance and promotes terrorism. Former CIA director James Woolsey described it as "the soil in which Al-Qaeda and its sister terrorist organizations are flourishing." In 2015, Sigmar Gabriel, Vice-Chancellor of Germany, accused the islamofascist Saudi dictator family of supporting intolerance and extremism, saying: "Wahhabi mosques are financed all over the world by Saudi Arabia (i.e. the islamofascist Saudi dictator family). In Germany, many dangerous islamists come from these communities." In May 2016, The New York Times editorialised that the islamofascist Saudi dictator family allied to the U.S. had "spent untold millions promoting Wahhabism, the radical form of Sunni islam that inspired the 9/11 hijackers and that now inflames the islamic State".




Klevius additional comment: The pattern seems familiar when compared to the original aggression of islam in cooperation with (some) Jews*. Just take a look at the Jewiah-islamic relations by checking out e.g. the myth of "the Andalusian paradise", or the twisted life of Maimonides (you know, the "great Jewish thinker" who only survived islam by pretending to be a muslim).

* Today Jews who are critical to islamic Human Rights violations are forbidden by Theresa May from entering UK (e.g. Pamela Geller) while Jews who are supportive of the Saudi cause are welcomed and honored.

Klevius wrote:

Wednesday, August 05, 2015

The Jewish origin of islam


Islam is a sect grown out of Judaism via Christianity.


According to Human Rights there are no "chosen people". Meaning that you may believe whatever you like as long as you follow legislation guided by the principle of Universal equality.

 Here's an approximate map of Judaism just before the origin of islam.


And below an approximate map of the violent muslim colonization in the foot steps of the Jewish slave trade routes.

 The above maps could be almost identical if produced with same techniques. This is no coincident but due to the "mysterious" code (the Jews) that made Arab imperialism possible and historical analysis impossible ("mysterious") if not included.  

Except for Khazaria, Jews were more business orientated than eager to waive swords compared to their copycats the Arab Bedouins. However, without wealthy and influential Jews leading the bloodthirsty and illiterate Bedouins (compare Ibn-Khaldun's description) and paving the way for the Arab looters (compare how the Jews used Turkic people in Khazaria in pretty much the same manner) the "Arab conquest" would have quickly dried out in the Arabian sand.

Dear reader. When reading Klevius analysis of the origin of islam, do always keep in mind the following important facts:

1 There was no Koran - only some Jewish/Christian text manipulations.

2  There was no Muhammad - only the old Jewish Messias (the rescuer/saver/leader) myth. Muhammad as described by muslims is a later invention snd doesn't appear in any official documents whatsoever before Malik.

3  Conventional "descriptions" of the "Arab conquest" are impossible and leave historians "amazed". Instead looting, booty, and sex slaves were the main incentives for the Bedouins. What was new was a more tight racist system of "we-and-the-other" which hindered (for a time) hindered internal divisions. On top of this was the Dhimmitude taxation system under the sword.

4 Understanding these point is also understanding that islam originated as a parasite and therefore never functioned as inspiration in itself for innovations etc. This is why every islamic colony has ended in bachwardness. Africa is an example of how a parasitic ideology was able to drain a whole continent.

Sunday, September 17, 2017

Theocrats: More RE! Klevius: More HRE (Human Rights education)! How can children possibly understand the evil of "religion" if they don't understand Human Rights?


Islam teaches that no "innocent" people should be killed. Islam also teaches that non-muslim 'kafirs' are sinners - i.e. not "innocent".



 What causes islamic "extremism"? Klevius answer: Uncritical islamophilia and Mohammadophilia.

"Diversity" (i.e. islampphilia) is the most fertile ground for islamofascism - and ought not to be conflated with 'pluralism' (see Klevius' article Angels of Antichrist) which is based on Human Rights equality.


When society signals with all its horns, not the least to innocent children at school, that "islam is a great religion", then no wonder that youngsters out of curiosity want to know the origin of this wonderful religion. And when they do, no matter if they check the Koran or Mohammad's behavior, or read it from historians such as e.g. Hugh Kennedy, the message is the same and in almost perfect disharmony with what they were taught in school.


So Klevius suggestion is to stop calling islam "a great religion" and instead telling children about islam's evil origin and how islamic sharia is against the most basic Human Rights in the anti-fascist Universal Human  Rights declaration of 1948 (especially the so called 'negative rights').

How close is Theresa May's definition of "extremism" to that of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family which is her "important ally".




BBC's debate audience applauded frenetically to muslim mayor of London's platitudes - which no one would even had noticed from a non-muslim mouth. Btw, the muslim mayor of London, Saddiq Khan, previously used to defend hateful supremacist preachers as e.g. the Fuhrer of Nation of Islam, Louis Eugene Wolcott (aka Farra-khan).


Almost equally much as when BBC accused Trump for "not being helpful" when Trump had pointed to the fact that English security often knows about islamists (and even has employed muslim terrorists).



Say "Trump" and the PC audience laugh and hate. Say "muslim" and they love it - no matter what. Clearly RE in England has produced what it was aimed for, i.e. padding "diversity", i.e. the "muslim community", i.e. the muslim Umma nation steered f
rom Saudi Arabia by the "custodians of islam", i.e. by the islamic hate spreading islamofascist Saudi dictator family (which is behind most evil deeds committed by muslims), i.e. by Theresa May's "important ally". This "ally", who has repeatedly attacked England via its hate propaganda and support of islamic jihadi, is then used by the English government as its "security adviser".


Give us a break!

Tendentious BBC fulfills every criterion for being "extremist" if measured against Human Rights.


BBC's hate propaganda against Buddhists is almost the exact opposite to its love propaganda for islam.

BBC, in its extremely onesided and misguiding reporting from Myanmar/Bangladesh, considers muslims "peaceful" - but Buddhists as violent.

And to make this weird equation "work" they eliminate evil terrorist muslims (who follow almost exactly the text in the Koran as well as the deeds of Mohammad) from islam but describe self defending people from Myanmar as "Buddhists" and therefore connected to Buddhism which lack all the evil original islam is contaminated with.

A voice from the web:

Over resent days, islam's political arm in Britain, the BBC and Channel 4, has been awash with stories of all the sufferings that the Rohinga muslim "refugees" have been enduring at the hands of the ""brutal Buddhists". No mention of the fact that the Buddhists have been forced, for nearly 40 years, to defend their country from attacks by Muslims, determined to turn Burma into an Islamic State and destroy Buddhism.

Klevius:  And behind the suffering is the usual culprit, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and its hate mongering and support of islamic violent and "peaceful" racist/sexist jihad.

Theresa May's use of the islamic "race card" is appalling - but at least it doesn't point to any muslim whatsoever.

.

Wednesday, September 13, 2017

Britisharia and Saudi islamofascist spread vs. the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights Declaration of 1948


The islamofascist Saudi dictator family utilizes an ideology based on violent conquest (terror/extortion/enslavement), hate (non-muslim "kuffars") and contempt for the rights of others incl. women (sharia).  And various collaborators are paid to lick this shit and spread its awful smell all over us.

China lacks such an ideology. Yet Mrs May chooses Saudi islamofascism over healthy Chinese manufacturing, technological development and trade benefiting people  around the world - not wars and religious terror.

Mona Siddiqui pushing the Britisharia wagon (Britishariot) in line with Cameron's wish to make London the world's hub for islamofascist finance.
So how did the English end up as Britishariots? It's all about Saudi islamofascism (incl. its Gulf etc. collaborators)

Theresa May: The perversion of islam which underlines the ideology that has led to violence...

Klevius: ...is the same as underlines the ideology that has led to a sharia complex that, according to ECHR, isn't compatible with European values based on Human Rights. In fact, sharia in whatever form (e.g. the Saudi based and steered muslim world organization OIC), is the absolute opposite to the anti-fascist 1948 Human Rights declaration which considers all humans equal - even women.

Demonizing the truth alternative fake "truths" such as that "islam equals 1.5 Billion muslms" when islam in fact equals the interest of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (plus its evil radiation).


The "rotten public" of today are the ignorant (or cowardice - or just benefiting from evil islamofascism) but "useful idiots".

If your nice neighbor turns out to be "right wing" (how "right wing" are May's Brexit fantasts)  it's usually very bad.

If s/he turns out to be nice but "islamophobic" it's almost like having a potential pedophile as your neighbor. Definitely worse than a potential but nice muslim terrorist.

However, if your nice neighbor turns out to be muslim it's good - no matter how close to the Saudi ideology s/he happens to be.

How come? And why not distinguish between Human Rights violating sharia muslims and other "muslims"? Right, because of sharia finance and lucrative business with the Devil himself. Who mentioned Faust? Mephisto?

Britisharia Broadcasting Company's cleaning* lady Mona Siddiqui

* According to historians (e.g. Hugh Kennedy and others) islam started as an attacking and looting religion where the main driving force was the "belief" in booty and sex slaves. And to keep the looters together they had to pray together five times a day so not to have time to slip over to "the wrong gang" - hence securing the cumulation of jihadi. This was then followed up by making as many women as possible pregnant under sharia marriage so that the offspring could be declared muslims. Moreover, these new muslims were then taught that the worst crime they could commit was leaving islam. Klevius thinks such an ideology is disgusting. So what about you" Or are you too intimidated to tell your opinion in the matter?

BBC's house imam Mona Siddiqui from Pakistan frequently babbles totally meaningless platitudes about islam in BBC's so called "news" programs. However, this supporter of islamofascism (defined as being against the most basic of the anti-fascist Human Rights in the 1948 declaration) also functions as the catalyst for the islamofascist Saudi dictator family which has managed to scandalize UN (which was created  to defend Human Rights equality) by bribing/threatening member states to rename Human Rights violating sharia as "islamic human rights" and now even got a key Human Rights role within UN although the islamofascist Saudi dictator family arguably has the worst record in the world. In other words, the ultimate desecration of what was meant to be the bastion against precisely such fascism.

Theresa May: "Many British people of different faiths follow religious codes and practices, and benefit a great deal from the guidance they offer."


Klevius: Sharia isn't "guidance"! Sharia is a way to avoid Human Rights equality.

Theresa May: "I start from the position that I don't think government should tell people, I don't think the government should tell women, what they should be wearing.

Klevius: But you think a patriarchal religion should do tell?

Theresa May: "I think it's for women to make a choice about what clothes they wish to wear. If they wish to wear a veil that is for a woman to make a choice.

Klevius: Is Mrs May really that ignorant? We aren't talking about a free individual choice under Human Rights here, we are talking about muslim girls/women under varying theocratic interpretations for the purpose of satisfying what it is supposed to mean to be collectively muslim.


Saturday, September 9, 2017

Sharia islam has a problem with Human Rights - so why doesn't Mishal Husain dare to talk about it rather than covering up muslim atrocities by only accusing the victims when they strike back?


Klevius question: Are "well integrated muslims" in non-muslim societies muslims at all according to Saudi wahhabism/salafism?



Aung San Suu Kyi: There are many moderate muslims who are well integrated in society. Klevius: But are they really muslims? 


Aung San Suu Kyi: "No one told me I was going to be interviewed by a Muslim." Klevius: No one probably tells you whether your doctor etc. is a muslim either.

Klevius: Does that include Mishal Husain? Is her silence about the spread of that Saudi sharia islamofascist hate that triggered the violence in Myanmar, conducive to Human Rights values? Is this why she so vehemently accuses Bhuddists while forgiving muslims who started the attacks?

Is Mishal Husain "well integrated in society"?

Mishal Husain: “The emphasis on what you wear on your head or how many times you pray, on the outward things rather than what’s in your heart and the way you treat people, I find slightly misguided,”

Until she studied at Cambridge University in the early 90s, Husain was not aware that some people called themselves British muslims: “Before that people generally said British Asian or ‘of Pakistani heritage’.


But now, Mishal, it seems that you and BBC make a big number of you being a "muslim", sort of. Wonder why, Mishal?

When her father was posted to Saudi Arabia, Mishal and her mother, were required to cover themselves completely and wear the abaya, a floor-length black cloak.  “It was… not enjoyable. Not great in the heat.”


No kidding! So why, Mishal, do you think your sisters over there keep doing it, Mishal?

Mishal Husain is notorious for being both heavily biased as well as aggressive in her polemical "interviews" - well in line with BBC's practice if not its declared policy.

Boris Johnson to Mishal Husain re. the killing of muslim terrorists: 'Corbyn is opposed to shoot to kill.'

Tory MP Philip Davies said the interview was 'outrageous'. 'Mishal Husain was acting as if she was the official spokeswoman for Jeremy Corbyn. The BBC is terribly biased but this was a new low even for the BBC.'

Mishal Husain has also defended Hamas terrorists who indiscriminately sprayed rocket propelled granades over civilians in Israel, by complaining that fewer Jews were hit than muslims in Israel's counter defense.

Pro-Saudi media in the West in general and BBC and its bigoted Saudi raised muslim presenter Mishal Husain in particular, are the real culprits behind the suffering of Bhuddists and and muslims in Myanmar.


Aung San Suu Kyi (after being interviewed by BBC's fanatic, bigoted and hypocritical Saudi raised muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain): "No one told me I was going to be interviewed by a Muslim"

Klevius: You must have missed Klevius writings about islam since 9/11. What a pity no one has told you that BBC long since converted to islam and now is the main channel for the islamofascist Saudi dictator family. And as there's absolutely nothing positive to report about the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (who is the de facto "guardian of islam") and its evil tentacles, BBC has become the main "media guardian" of Saudi wahhabism/salafism and its hate mongering and violence all over the world, by keeping its compulsory license fee paying viewers/listeners in complete darkness behind a wall of fake news "reporting". Not even Al Jazeera can compete.

Peter Popham: There is nothing in Suu Kyi’s earlier life to lead one to think that she might be bigoted. As I revealed in my biography of Suu Kyi, The Lady and the Peacock, her first serious boyfriend when she was a student at Oxford was a Pakistani (he went on to become a top diplomat for his country), she lived for 20 years in multicultural Britain without manifesting any known anti-Muslim hostility, and one of the key people who persuaded her to get involved in Burma’s democracy uprising was Maung Thaw Ka, a Muslim journalist and author who subsequently died in jail.

So given her tolerant, liberal background, why did she appear to rage about Mishal Husain?

Klevius answer: Could it be because of Mishal Husain's strange silence about the role of Saudi islamic hate mongering as the main igniter to the problem? Muslim atrocities against Bhuddists to a point were it all boiled over.

Media attention should be directed to the Saudi/islam initiated wahhabi/salafi muslim hate mongering, violence and islamic "kuffar" racism and sexism in Myanmar.

However, instead BBC uses its most bigoted and hypocritical muslim reporter, Pakistan rooted and Saudi fostered Mishal Husain (yes, the very one who brags about drinking alcohol, not fasting during Ramadan and not wearing muslim attires) to create hatred against Bhuddists. Mishal Husain, who, in front of all the girls/women suffering under sharia islam, also brags about how she doesn't see any threats to her way of life - although Klevius uses to remind her that this is because of Human Rights, not islamic sharia.


The Rohingya of Myanmar – Pawns in an Anglo-Chinese Proxy War Fought by Saudi Jihadists


By Moon of Alabama
Global Research, September 05, 2017
Moon of Alabama 4 September 2017
Region: Asia
Theme: Global Economy, Militarization and WMD, Police State & Civil Rights, US NATO War Agenda

Media attention is directed to some minor ethnic violence in Myanmar, the former Burma. The story in the “western” press is of Muslim Rohingya unfairly vilified, chased out and killed by  Buddhist mobs and the army in the state of Rakhine near the border to Bangladesh. The “liberal human interventionists” like Human Rights Watch are united with Islamists like Turkey’s President Erdogan in loudly lamenting the plight of the Rohingya.

That curious alliance also occurred during the wars on Libya and Syria. It is by now a warning sign. Could there be more behind this than some local conflict in Myanmar? Is someone stocking a fire?

Indeed.

While the ethnic conflict in Rankine state is very old, it has over the last years morphed into an Jihadist guerilla war financed and led from Saudi Arabia. The area is of geo-strategic interest:

    Rakhine plays an important part in [the Chinese One Belt One Road Initiative] OBOR, as it is an exit to Indian Ocean and the location of planned billion-dollar Chinese projects—a planned economic zone on Ramree Island, and the Kyaukphyu deep-sea port, which has oil and natural gas pipelines linked with Yunnan Province’s Kunming.

Pipelines from the western coast of Myanmar eastwards to China allow hydrocarbon imports from the Persian Gulf to China while avoiding the bottleneck of the Strait of Malacca and disputed parts of the South China Sea.

It is in “Western interest” to hinder China’s projects in Myanmar. Inciting Jihad in Rakhine could help to achieve that. There is historic precedence for such a proxy war in Burma. During World War II British imperial forces incited the Rohingya Muslim in Rakhine to fight Burmese nationalist Buddhists allied with Japanese imperialists.

The Rohingya immigrated to the northern parts of Arakan, today’s Rakhine state of Myanmar, since the 16th century. A large wave came under British imperial occupation some hundred years ago. Illegal immigration from Bangladesh continued over the last decades. In total about 1.1 million of Muslim Rohingya live in Myanmar. The birthrate of the Rohingya is said to be higher than that of the local Arakanese Buddhists. These feel under pressure in their own land.

While these populations are mixed in some towns there are many hamlets that belong 100% to either one. There is generally little integration of Rohingya within Myanmar. Most are officially not accepted as citizens. Over the centuries and the last decades there have been several violent episodes between the immigrants and the local people. The last Muslim-Buddhist conflict raged in 2012.

Since then a clearly Islamist insurgency was build up in the area. It acts under the name Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) and is led by Ataullah abu Ammar Junjuni, a Jihadist from Pakistan. (ARSA earlier operated under the name Harakah al-Yakin, or Faith Movement.) Ataullah was born into the large Rohingya community of Karachi, Pakistan. He grew up and was educated in Saudi Arabia. He received military training in Pakistan and worked as Wahhabi Imam in Saudi Arabia before he came to Myanmar. He has since brainwashed, hired and trained a local guerrilla army of some 1,000 Takfiris.

According to a 2015 report in the Pakistani newspaper Dawn there are more than 500,000 Rohingya in Karachi. They came from Bangladesh during the 1970s and 1980s on the behest on General Ziaul Haq’s military regime and the CIA to fight the Soviets and the government of Afghanistan:

    Rohingya community [in Karachi] is more inclined towards religion and they send their children to madressahs. It is a major reason that many religious parties, especially the Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat, the JI and the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl, have their organisational set-up in Burmese neighborhoods.
    …
    “A number of Rohingya members living in Arakan Abad have lost their relatives in recent attacks by Buddhist mobs in June 2012 in Myanmar,” said Mohammad Fazil, a local JI activist.Rohingyas in Karachi regularly collect donations, Zakat and hides of sacrificial animals and send these to Myanmar and Bangladesh to support the displaced families.

Reuters noted in late 2016 that the Jihadist group is trained, led and financed through Pakistan and Saudi Arabia:

    A group of Rohingya Muslims that attacked Myanmar border guards in October is headed by people with links to Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, the International Crisis Group (ICG) said on Thursday, citing members of the group.
    …
    “Though not confirmed, there are indications [Ataullah] went to Pakistan and possibly elsewhere, and that he received practical training in modern guerrilla warfare,” the group said. It noted that Ata Ullah was one of 20 Rohingya from Saudi Arabia leading the group’s operations in Rakhine State.Separately, a committee of 20 senior Rohingya emigres oversees the group, which has headquarters in Mecca, the ICG said.

The ARSA Jihadists claim to only attack government forces but civilian Arakanese Buddhists have also been ambushed and massacred. Bugghist hamlets were also burned down.

The government of Myanmar alleges that Ataullah and his group want to declare an independent Islamic State. In October 2016 his group started to attack police and other government forces in the area. On August 25 this year his group attacked 30 police stations and military outposts and killed some 12 policemen. The army and police responded, as is usual in this conflict, by burning down Rohingya townships suspected of hiding guerrilla forces.

To escape the growing violence many local Arakanese Buddhist flee their towns towards the capitol of Rankine. Local Rohingya Muslim flee across the border to Bangladesh. Only the later refugees seem to get international attention.

The Myanmar army has ruled the country for decades. Under economic pressure it nominally opened up to the “west” and instituted “democracy”. The darling of the “west” in Myanmar is Daw Aung San Suu Kyi. Her party won the elections and she has a dominant role in the government. But Aung San Suu Kyi is foremost a nationalist and the real power is still held by the generals.

Aung San in Burma National Army uniform (Source: Wikimedia Commons)

While Aung San Suu Kyi was propped up as democratic icon she has little personal merit except being the daughter of Thakin Aung San, a famous leader of the Burma Independence Army (BIA) and the “father of the nation”. In the 1940s Thakin Aung San was recruited by the Imperial Japanese Army to wage a guerrilla war against the colonial British army and the British supply line to anti-Japanese forces in China:

    The young Aung San learned to wear Japanese traditional clothing, speak the language, and even took a Japanese name. In historian Thant Myint-U’s “The River of Lost Footsteps,” he describes him as “apparently getting swept away in all the fascist euphoria surrounding him,” but notes that his commitment remained to independence for Myanmar.

The ethnic strife in Rakhine also played a role in the British-Japanese conflict over Burma:

    In April 1942, Japanese troops advanced into Rakhine State and reached Maungdaw Township, near the border with what was then British India, and is now Bangladesh. As the British retreated to India, Rakhine became a front line.Local Arakanese Buddhists collaborated with the BIA and Japanese forces but the British recruited area Muslims to counter the Japanese.

    “Both armies, British and Japanese, exploited the frictions and animosity in the local population to further their own military aims,” wrote scholar Moshe Yegar

When the British won against the Japanese Thakin Aung San change sides and negotiated the end of British imperial rule over Burma. He was assassinated in 1947 with the help of British officers. Since then Burma, later renamed to Myanmar, was ruled by ever competing factions of the military.

Thakin Aung San’s daughter Aung San Suu Kyi received a British education and was build up for a role in Myanmar. In the 1980s and 90s she quarreled with the military government. She was given a Nobel Peace Prize and was promoted as progressive defender of human rights by the “western” literati. But she, and the National League for Democracy (NLD). she leads, were always the opposite – ultra-right fascists in Buddhist Saffron robes. The hypocrites are now disappointed that she does not speak out in favor of the Rohingya. But doing so would put her on the opposite side her father had famously fought for. It would also put her in opposition to most of the people in Myanmar who have little sympathy for the Rohingya and their Jihadi fight.

Moreover – the Chinese OBOR projects are a huge bon for Myanmar and will help with its economic development. The Saudis and Pakistani send guerilla commanders and money to incite the Rohingya to Jihad in Myanmar.  This is a historic repeat of the CIA operation against Soviet influence in Afghanistan. But unlike in Afghanistan the people of Myanmar are not Muslim they will surely fight against, not join, any Jihad in their country. The Rohingya are now pawns in the great game and will suffer from it.

Tuesday, September 5, 2017

Brexit desperation gets more evil by the day: BBC's appallingly one sided and faked reporting about Buddhism and Myanmar is (as usual) all about supporting the islamofascist Saudi dictator family/islam as tools against China's peaceful development of trade relations.


Saudi ("the guardian of islam") islam means islamofascism - and BBC/Mrs Therea May not only support it but even calls it "an important ally".



How many extra stabbings murders, rapes etc. are caused by Saudi islamic hate mongering - and how much of that blood and suffering should be blamed on today's worst Goebbelian propaganda machinery, BBC, which makes all it can to blink it for its compulsory license fee paying listeners and viewers? 

You can be absolutely sure that BBC's intense and disgusting "reporting" about the problems in Myanmar that was initiated by Saudi supported Wahhabi/Salafi muslim jihadi racist hate and violence against Buddhists, has nothing to do with people suffering but all to do with evil political and military interests. BBC has swallowed mountains of suffering caused by muslims without even noticing. BBC is the world champion of cherry picking among human tragedies so that it always becomes aligned with BBC's Saudi/islam* interest.

* The islamofascist Saudi dictator family and "custodians of islam's holy places") is not only the leader of the muslim Arab world but also keeps all the world's muslims and "muslims" more or less hostage via Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia as well as by the evil fact that apostasy js considered the worst crime in islam.

British colonialism caused enormous suffering in China (read history, dude). Yet, the Brexit sinking "empire" tries the same evil tactics again. Later on the British and the Japanese used similar tactics in using muslim jihadi and Bhuddists in their campaigns against each others. And today England and Japan "fight" side by side against China with the proxy of North Korea. US/Trump at least got some weapons sold to South Korea and Japan as a result of the tension created by US aggressive military presence there. How many weapons will England sell to European neighbors of Russia? The advertising is already intense through BBC Russophobia and military presence/provocation.

Yet, the heartland of today's fascism isn't even mentioned. How did England and BBC end up with supporting the worst hate and violence spreading dictatorship the world has ever seen? Future historians will be even more stunned over the appeasement of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family than we are when reading about Nazi (National-socialist) atrocities in the 1930s and 40s.

Klevius really wonders how BBC staff can sleep at night. Or is it a complete loss of moral that makes their sleep possible? And those in BBC still possessing some sort of moral conscience probably don't dare to say anything. Eh - wasn't that constellation the hallmark of fascism?



Global Research, September 05, 2017:

It is in “Western interest” to hinder China’s projects in Myanmar. 


Inciting Jihad in Rakhine could help to achieve that. There is historic precedence for such a proxy war in Burma. During World War II British imperial forces incited the Rohingya Muslim in Rakhine to fight Burmese nationalist Buddhists allied with Japanese imperialists.

The Rohingya immigrated to the northern parts of Arakan, today’s Rakhine state of Myanmar, since the 16th century. A large wave came under British imperial occupation some hundred years ago. Illegal immigration from Bangladesh continued over the last decades. In total about 1.1 million of Muslim Rohingya live in Myanmar. The birthrate of the Rohingya is said to be higher than that of the local Arakanese Buddhists. These feel under pressure in their own land.

While these populations are mixed in some towns there are many hamlets that belong 100% to either one. There is generally little integration of Rohingya within Myanmar. Most are officially not accepted as citizens. Over the centuries and the last decades there have been several violent episodes between the immigrants and the local people. The last Muslim-Buddhist conflict raged in 2012.

Since then a clearly Islamist insurgency was build up in the area. It acts under the name Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) and is led by Ataullah abu Ammar Junjuni, a Jihadist from Pakistan. (ARSA earlier operated under the name Harakah al-Yakin, or Faith Movement.) Ataullah was born into the large Rohingya community of Karachi, Pakistan. He grew up and was educated in Saudi Arabia. He received military training in Pakistan and worked as Wahhabi Imam in Saudi Arabia before he came to Myanmar. He has since brainwashed, hired and trained a local guerrilla army of some 1,000 Takfiris.

According to a 2015 report in the Pakistani newspaper Dawn there are more than 500,000 Rohingya in Karachi. They came from Bangladesh during the 1970s and 1980s on the behest on General Ziaul Haq’s military regime and the CIA to fight the Soviets and the government of Afghanistan:

    Rohingya community [in Karachi] is more inclined towards religion and they send their children to madressahs. It is a major reason that many religious parties, especially the Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat, the JI and the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl, have their organisational set-up in Burmese neighborhoods.
    …
    “A number of Rohingya members living in Arakan Abad have lost their relatives in recent attacks by Buddhist mobs in June 2012 in Myanmar,” said Mohammad Fazil, a local JI activist.Rohingyas in Karachi regularly collect donations, Zakat and hides of sacrificial animals and send these to Myanmar and Bangladesh to support the displaced families.

Reuters noted in late 2016 that the Jihadist group is trained, led and financed through Pakistan and Saudi Arabia:

    A group of Rohingya Muslims that attacked Myanmar border guards in October is headed by people with links to Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, the International Crisis Group (ICG) said on Thursday, citing members of the group.
    …
    “Though not confirmed, there are indications [Ataullah] went to Pakistan and possibly elsewhere, and that he received practical training in modern guerrilla warfare,” the group said. It noted that Ata Ullah was one of 20 Rohingya from Saudi Arabia leading the group’s operations in Rakhine State.Separately, a committee of 20 senior Rohingya emigres oversees the group, which has headquarters in Mecca, the ICG said.

The ARSA Jihadists claim to only attack government forces but civilian Arakanese Buddhists have also been ambushed and massacred. Bugghist hamlets were also burned down.

The government of Myanmar alleges that Ataullah and his group want to declare an independent Islamic State. In October 2016 his group started to attack police and other government forces in the area. On August 25 this year his group attacked 30 police stations and military outposts and killed some 12 policemen. The army and police responded, as is usual in this conflict, by burning down Rohingya townships suspected of hiding guerrilla forces.

To escape the growing violence many local Arakanese Buddhist flee their towns towards the capitol of Rankine. Local Rohingya Muslim flee across the border to Bangladesh. Only the later refugees seem to get international attention.

The Myanmar army has ruled the country for decades. Under economic pressure it nominally opened up to the “west” and instituted “democracy”. The darling of the “west” in Myanmar is Daw Aung San Suu Kyi. Her party won the elections and she has a dominant role in the government. But Aung San Suu Kyi is foremost a nationalist and the real power is still held by the generals.

Aung San in Burma National Army uniform (Source: Wikimedia Commons)

While Aung San Suu Kyi was propped up as democratic icon she has little personal merit except being the daughter of Thakin Aung San, a famous leader of the Burma Independence Army (BIA) and the “father of the nation”. In the 1940s Thakin Aung San was recruited by the Imperial Japanese Army to wage a guerrilla war against the colonial British army and the British supply line to anti-Japanese forces in China:

    The young Aung San learned to wear Japanese traditional clothing, speak the language, and even took a Japanese name. In historian Thant Myint-U’s “The River of Lost Footsteps,” he describes him as “apparently getting swept away in all the fascist euphoria surrounding him,” but notes that his commitment remained to independence for Myanmar.

The ethnic strife in Rakhine also played a role in the British-Japanese conflict over Burma:

    In April 1942, Japanese troops advanced into Rakhine State and reached Maungdaw Township, near the border with what was then British India, and is now Bangladesh. As the British retreated to India, Rakhine became a front line.Local Arakanese Buddhists collaborated with the BIA and Japanese forces but the British recruited area Muslims to counter the Japanese.

    “Both armies, British and Japanese, exploited the frictions and animosity in the local population to further their own military aims,” wrote scholar Moshe Yegar

When the British won against the Japanese Thakin Aung San change sides and negotiated the end of British imperial rule over Burma. He was assassinated in 1947 with the help of British officers. Since then Burma, later renamed to Myanmar, was ruled by ever competing factions of the military.

Thakin Aung San’s daughter Aung San Suu Kyi received a British education and was build up for a role in Myanmar. In the 1980s and 90s she quarreled with the military government. She was given a Nobel Peace Prize and was promoted as progressive defender of human rights by the “western” literati. But she, and the National League for Democracy (NLD). she leads, were always the opposite – ultra-right fascists in Buddhist Saffron robes. The hypocrites are now disappointed that she does not speak out in favor of the Rohingya. But doing so would put her on the opposite side her father had famously fought for. It would also put her in opposition to most of the people in Myanmar who have little sympathy for the Rohingya and their Jihadi fight.

Moreover – the Chinese OBOR projects are a huge bon for Myanmar and will help with its economic development. The Saudis and Pakistani send guerilla commanders and money to incite the Rohingya to Jihad in Myanmar.  This is a historic repeat of the CIA operation against Soviet influence in Afghanistan. But unlike in Afghanistan the people of Myanmar are not Muslim they will surely fight against, not join, any Jihad in their country. The Rohingya are now pawns in the great game and will suffer from it.


Saturday, September 2, 2017

Mrs. May and BBC feed compulsory fee paying English people with Saudi sharia, boring and useless cricket* and racist EU and China hate speech, while football, EU and China are way more popular.

* Klevius has been told that BBC deliberately tries to boost cricket propaganda while suppressing football etc. As a result English compulsory license fee payers are force fed with cricket in every possible and impossible part of BBC's news and other broadcastings by BBC. The situation is already laughable - but for how long will it be tolerated by the people? And was the horrifying crossbow incident last week a lunatic's response to this strange media propaganda? We've heard about attacks on football matches but never when it comes to cricket before. Who sane person could possibly be excited by cricket anyway - a "sport" that compared to football is like ice compared to steam. Or like comparing islamist countries with Atheist countries like China and Japan.

Is Mrs May digging a miserable "British" sharia caliphate grave under the Brexit cliff?





England is now almost totally  dependent on its service sector - a sector that is robotized faster than the manufacturing sector ever was.


Is the laundering of dirty sharia blood money what England will be relying on after Brexit?

However, China is now not only leading robotization but also has the fastest future growth safeguarded today.


Top (industrial)robot companies in the world – robot install base worldwide

    Fanuc (Japan) – 400,000.
    Yaskawa (Japan) – 300,000.
    ABB (Sweden/Switzerland) – 300,000.
    Kawasaki (Japan) – 110,000.
    Nachi (Japan) – 100,000.
    Kuka (China) – 80,000.
    Denso (Japan) – 80,000.
    Mitsubishi (Japan) – 70,000.
    Epson (Japan) – 55,000
    Stäubli (Switzerland) – 45,000
    Foxconn (Taiwan) – 40,000
    Comau (Italy) – 30,000
    Omron/Adept (Japan) – 25,000





While Theresa May threatens to kill hundreds of thousands with nuke strikes China builds a better world for itself and others. Just as Japan did after WW2.

England could benefit a lot by cooperating with China. China also loves football - you know, the game England invented. However, Mrs May prefers Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and cricket. "Sharia is good for the Brits". But Klevius wonders: Who are the "Brits"? British National Party or Muslim Sharia Council of Britain? Or perhaps May, Fox and Davies?








Mrs May, Mr Fox and Mr Davies want to sell Saudi islamofascist hate mongering as "British security competence" to EU.

The Great Wall of China has opened its gates - while Mrs May bows before the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

And BBC continues to miss the open goal, i.e. that out of the two islamic theocracies Iran and Saudi Arabia, one is democratic and the other is a full blown dictatorship. Just as they have missed that Saudi supported Bahrain has a huge shia majority with no democratic say whatsoever. BBC seems to compete hard for being the world's most faked, bigoted and hypocritical media company.



Theresa May dislikes Human Rights because they are against sharia - except when she criticizes China of course.

Sunday, August 27, 2017

Klevius lackmus-lim test*: Why Klevius is morally superior to sharia muslim supremacists - and Mrs Theresa May's sharia "moral"**

* Just ask a racist Polishphobic "Brit" if s/he would dare to be equally critical to muslims. 

** Is it because of her close ties to the islamofascist Saudi dictator family that she knowingly accepts and supports sharia islamofascism in England - and therefore plays the race card against non-muslim EU residents (e.g. Polishphobia) in England?

How does Mrs May's, BBC's etc. extreme nationalist rhetoric (e.g. deliberately conflating 'immigrants' with EU 'residents' in England while simultaneously emphasizing "Britishness" and "our laws" and "our country") differ from e.g. BNP?  And isn't it enough that EU residents can't vote about their own status while non-EU residents in England (mostly muslims) are allowed to vote - now she wants to rob them of their last resort to protect themselves against racist "British legislation" by denying them the protection from the European Court of Justice?


Klevius' ("the extremely normal") moral rests on the basic (i.e. so called 'negative rights') Human Rights in the anti-fascist 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration.

1 There can not exist an absolute fixed moral - just like there can not exist a forever fixed material culture - not even in a hunter/gatherer society (see Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992).

2 Any non-universal stance (e.g. religious) inevitably creates segregation and tensions - and especially in the case of islam constitutes a fertile ground for dangerous and divisive extremism. The only true "diversity" is the one made possible by the 1948 Human Rights declaration. And make no mistake, that declaration doesn't approve of a "freedom of religion" that breeds intolerance against everyone's Human Rights.

3 Only way to go then is negative Human Rights , i.e. to follow and adapt to a changing world while keeping impositions to a minimum and the rights of the individual to a maximum - which excludes every meaningful form of islam. Even the most "moderate" of sharia muslims will inevitably clash with Universal Human Rights. And if they don't, well then they will disappeare from Klevius' "islamophobia" scanner but might instead show up on the islamofascist apostasy scanner.

Mrs May's curriculum for sharia islamofascism sponsored by the islamofascist Saudi dictator family is rapidly turning England into an islamic caliphate where sharia replaces Human Rights - and pointing this out is so called "islamophobia"



London Bridge terrorist Khuram Butt worked as a teacher at an islamic primary community school in Eton where he 'radicalized children as young as four' in after school Koran classes as an unpaid volunteer.

Butt, Rachid Redouane and Youssef Zaghba drove a van into pedestrians and jumped out of  a van in London Bridge wearing fake suicide vests while Mrs Theresa May had to escape.




Not only Polish and other East European residents in England have been targeted by Mrs Theresa May's EU/Human Rights-phobia. Scandinavia's biggest newspaper Aftonbladet reports the same about "British racism" against Swedes in London.


EU-minister: "I'm chocked"